CO129-058 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [8-10] — Page 181

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

V

this kind

Committee in

Foreign

jurisdiction. This is also the opinion of

The Law Officers of

the Crown to whom this point has been

referred.

The 4th and

the 5th clauses

of the Imperial Act therefore

should not be adopted by

any Colonial Legislature

And the Council of Hong

Kong should confine

itself to imposing a penalty

on all who marry,

within

the

In a like effort the Legislature of Hong Kong & Macao framed an Ordinance to alter and materially amend the Established Laws of England in respect of the crime of bigamy, and how much

the Colony, knowingly

tender in evidence

a document

of

any

nature

permitted as perjury contemplated by

which does not are similar to

the laws

than by Means of

False evidence

It is wither

before

In you to make

is much

as sanction this

Reference to a subjoined that I have compiled is

Treaty

the

Imperial Legislature which

their defence.

contains

false evidence.

is supported by a counterfeit

Seal or

Ordinance.

With state the Subordinate division de rightly discretionary De opinion (8th Jan. 1856) Land is Expedient- 4 Gran transmit d

It is quite reposant

is karon & mixture to hold tal hlement wie i

orgnature.

The 5th Why are

the clauses

are

also

considered objectionable by

the Law Officers of

the Crown &

made the subject of paying:

allion

phim shen, if this astiam are stated in

mu sanctioned, would te

thing at Hong Kong.

the

ground do which

the

annence &

Ancient expect from their Report

different

thing in the rest of Her dominion,

"This is

Report of

1859. Ju in hepat 1/4 7.0 of 5. Not. 1856.

they

You will always that thing

do

& Contractment. "(4) to the end.

obliged to the

admission

Edit History

2026-05-18 04:56:02 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
V this kind Committee in Foreign jurisdiction. This is also the opinion of The Law Officers of the Crown to whom this point has been referred. The 4th and the 5th clauses of the Imperial Act therefore should not be adopted by any Colonial Legislature And the Council of Hong Kong should confine itself to imposing a penalty on all who marry, within the In a like effort the Legislature of Hong Kong & Macao framed an Ordinance to alter and materially amend the Established Laws of England in respect of the crime of bigamy, and how much the Colony, knowingly tender in evidence a document of any nature permitted as perjury contemplated by which does not are similar to the laws than by Means of False evidence It is wither before In you to make is much as sanction this Reference to a subjoined that I have compiled is Treaty the Imperial Legislature which their defence. contains false evidence. is supported by a counterfeit Seal or Ordinance. With state the Subordinate division de rightly discretionary De opinion (8th Jan. 1856) Land is Expedient- 4 Gran transmit d It is quite reposant is karon & mixture to hold tal hlement wie i orgnature. The 5th Why are the clauses are also considered objectionable by the Law Officers of the Crown & made the subject of paying: allion phim shen, if this astiam are stated in mu sanctioned, would te thing at Hong Kong. the ground do which the annence & Ancient expect from their Report different thing in the rest of Her dominion, "This is Report of 1859. Ju in hepat 1/4 7.0 of 5. Not. 1856. they You will always that thing do & Contractment. "(4) to the end. obliged to the admission
Baseline (Original)
act V this kind Commut bed in Foreign ཚལ་ཉུལ་གོཏང་ཡིན༽པའ། རི་ཝང furisdiction. This is als the opinion off offion of The Laws the Crown to whom this point has been refered. f th The 4 and the 5th clauses theufre the Imperive Act the pre should not be adopted by any Colonise Legislature And the Council off Itong Rony should confire itself to imposing a penalty on all who mary, within the In A Los effort the Kenz cams of it Rony & Racks Fr mcaid of, zu A Spirim A And They helpon to alter mond materially the Es Mished Cams of England in respect of the cure of Leying, and ho mohan 170 the Colony, knowingl tender in evidence document O any the nature 12! permishath as perging contemplated by hich don ust are smili the laws thal than by Melus of Fins Land Eun it it won wither Gilafore In jou te to make b is much 0 2. M. Is sanction this Referee to a sud dyn that I han kompur is i Trature the Imprire Inture which eir dence. contains false ev is supported by a counterfeit Seala m'nance. ith mild in dia Į With state the Sulstorm a shivion de righly disentionail De opinie (8 du 1. 1856) Land in Expedient- 4 Gransmit d A It is quits reposant is karon & misture to hold tal hlement wie i 1 orgnature. The 5th Why are the clauses are 7 also considered objectionable by Inmatened cirrelevant to the the Law Officers of isen stall, if unture, h Grown & made the rubject of paying: allion phim shen, if this astiam are stated in mu santioned, woed te thing at Hong K. 2 the grown do which the annence & Aishent expect from their Report different thing in the rest of Amidominion, "This is Reper of po Reth. 859. Ju in hepat 1/4 7.0 of 5. Not. 1856. >> وار کاسمی they You will alware that thing do & Cractment. "(4) to the end. obyged to the admission
2026-05-18 04:56:02 · Baseline
View content

act

V

this kind

Commut bed in

Foreign

ཚལ་ཉུལ་གོཏང་ཡིན༽པའ། རི་ཝང furisdiction. This is als

the opinion off

offion of

The Laws

the Crown to

whom this point has been

refered.

f

th The 4 and

the 5th clauses

theufre

the Imperive Act the pre

should not be adopted by

any

Colonise Legislature

And the Council off Itong

Rony should confire

itself

to imposing a penalty

on all who

mary,

within

the

In A Los effort the Kenz cams of it Rony & Racks Fr mcaid of,

zu A

Spirim

A

And

They helpon to alter mond materially the Es Mished Cams of England in respect of the

cure of Leying, and ho mohan

170

the Colony, knowingl

tender in evidence

document

O

any

the nature

12! permishath as perging contemplated by

hich don ust are smili

the laws

thal than by Melus of

Fins Land

Eun it it won wither

Gilafore

In jou te to make

b

is much 0 2. M. Is sanction this

Referee to a sud dyn that I han kompur is

i

Trature

the

Imprire Inture which

eir dence.

contains

false ev

is supported by a counterfeit

Seala

m'nance.

ith mild in dia

Į

With state the Sulstorm a shivion de righly disentionail De opinie (8 du 1. 1856) Land in Expedient- 4 Gransmit d

A

It is quits reposant

is karon & misture to hold tal hlement wie i

1

orgnature.

The 5th Why are

the clauses

are

7

also

considered objectionable by

Inmatened cirrelevant to the the Law Officers of

isen stall, if

unture,

h

Grown &

made the rubject of paying:

allion

phim shen, if this astiam are stated in

mu santioned, woed te

thing at Hong K. 2

the

grown do which

the

annence &

Aishent expect from their Report

different

thing in the rest of Amidominion,

"This is

Reper of po

Reth.

859. Ju in hepat 1/4 7.0 of 5. Not. 1856.

>>

وار کاسمی

they

You will alware that thing

do

& Cractment. "(4) to the end.

obyged to the

admission

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.